Extraction & Processing Facility Energy Loads: CO2, Ethanol, and Hydrocarbon Methods Compared
An extraction lab uses far less electricity per square foot than a grow, but it uses it badly from a billing standpoint: big chillers, heaters, and exhaust fans that run in bursts during a shift and sit idle at night. That low load factor means demand charges are a larger share of the bill than the kWh suggests. Which method you run changes the shape. CO2 systems are pump-and-chiller heavy and run long cycles; ethanol labs are dominated by solvent recovery heaters and the chillers that condense the vapor back; hydrocarbon labs have the smallest process loads but carry the fixed cost of C1D1 ventilation.
By Jason Taken, Founder, Jaken Energy
Updated September 12, 2026How a lab's load differs from a grow's
A cultivation facility is a lighting load with HVAC attached, running two long flat shifts a day. The Northwest Power and Conservation Council's producer survey put lighting at 66 percent of grow electricity, with cooling at 15 percent and ventilation at 12 percent, and estimated indoor canopy in Oregon at 128 kWh per square foot per year [nwpcc-cannabis]. An extraction and processing facility looks nothing like that. Its lighting is ordinary; its load is process equipment: compressors, pumps, heaters, chillers, vacuum pumps, and exhaust fans, most of which run for hours at a time during a shift and then stop.
For scale, the average U.S. commercial building used 12.6 kWh per square foot of electricity in 2018, and the median was 8.6 [eia-cbecs-2018-c14]. A busy lab sits well above that, but nowhere near a grow. What matters more than the annual kWh is the shape of the load, which is why the rest of this page is organized around the equipment and the profile rather than a single intensity number.
The equipment, and what it draws
Manufacturer specifications give a good picture of what individual pieces pull. These are nameplate or rated figures; actual draw depends on setpoint and duty cycle.
| Equipment | Role | Cited rating |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum drying oven, 1.9 cu ft, 150 C model | Purging residual solvent from hydrocarbon or ethanol extracts | 1,500 W, at 110 V (13.6 A) or 220 V (6.8 A) single-phase [across-eco-vacuum-oven] |
| Vacuum oven, 1.9 cu ft, 500 C model | Higher-temperature drying and decarboxylation | 3,000 W at 220 V single-phase, four 750 W elements [across-500c-vacuum-oven] |
| Rotary evaporator, 20 L | Batch ethanol removal from tincture | 4,300 W total at 220 V, 20 A; evaporates about 7.5 L of ethanol per hour [across-solventvap-20l] |
| Falling film evaporator, 20 gal/hr class | Continuous ethanol recovery | Electric-heated model rated 79.4 A at 240 V three-phase, or 43.3 A at 480 V [trusteel-autovap-15] |
| Small recirculating chillers | Condensing solvent vapor, cooling extraction columns, rotovap condensers | Portable models from 0.85 kW to 2.9 kW of cooling capacity [polyscience-durachill]; process chillers for large ethanol and CO2 systems are several times larger |
Two things stand out. First, the solvent recovery step dominates an ethanol lab: 79.4 amps at 240 volts three-phase is about 33 kVA for a single evaporator [trusteel-autovap-15], more than a whole rack of ovens. Second, a lot of that heat has to be taken back out. Every kilowatt of heater energy that boils ethanol becomes a kilowatt of vapor that a condenser and chiller must remove, so the chiller side of a recovery system draws a large fraction of what the heater does.
CO2, ethanol, and hydrocarbon: three load profiles
Supercritical CO2. The process runs at high pressure, which means a pump or compressor and a motor to drive it, plus a chiller to keep the CO2 liquid at the pump inlet and heaters to bring the extraction vessel to setpoint. Run times are long, commonly several hours per batch, and larger systems recycle CO2 continuously. The profile is a plateau: a sizable three-phase motor load plus chiller that switches on at the start of the run and stays on. Post-processing is lighter than ethanol because there is no bulk solvent to boil off, though winterization of the crude can add an ethanol step and a rotovap. Demand is set at run start when pump, chiller, and heaters all come up together; energy is high per batch but the daily pattern is predictable, which makes CO2 labs good candidates for night runs on time-of-use tariffs.
Ethanol. Cold ethanol extraction itself is cheap: a chilled tank, a centrifuge or agitator, and a filter. The bill comes from what happens next. The extract is dilute, so every gallon of solvent used has to be recovered, and that means heaters and chillers running for hours. A 20 gallon-per-hour recovery unit at roughly 33 kVA [trusteel-autovap-15] and a 20 L rotovap at 4.3 kW [across-solventvap-20l] for the last pass, plus the chillers serving both, can be the majority of the lab's peak. Add the freezer or chiller that keeps the ethanol at extraction temperature, which runs continuously. Ethanol labs have the highest kWh of the three methods at equal throughput and a peak that is very sensitive to whether the evaporator and the rotovap are started in the same interval.
Hydrocarbon (butane and propane). The solvent boils at low temperature, so recovery needs only modest heat and a chiller to condense it back into the tank. Process electrical load is the smallest of the three: a recovery pump, a chiller of a few horsepower, warm-water baths, and the vacuum ovens for purging, which at 1.5 to 3 kW each [across-eco-vacuum-oven] [across-500c-vacuum-oven] are the long-running piece since purges take many hours. What the hydrocarbon lab carries instead is the code-required room. Colorado Springs' fire department, for example, requires the extraction room to be electrically classified as Class 1, Division 1, monitored by a gas detector that alarms at set thresholds, ventilated to keep gas concentration at acceptable levels, built as an F-1 occupancy separated by a one-hour fire barrier, and equipped only with systems on its approved equipment list [csfd-extraction]. The exhaust fans and detection in that room run around the clock in most designs, which gives a hydrocarbon lab a flat baseline that never goes to zero. Requirements vary by jurisdiction; confirm yours with the fire marshal.
| CO2 | Ethanol | Hydrocarbon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largest single load | Pump or compressor plus chiller | Solvent recovery heater plus its chiller | C1D1 exhaust (continuous) and vacuum ovens |
| Shape | Long plateau per batch | Tall peaks during recovery | Low, flat, with a fixed baseline |
| Best cheap fix | Run batches off-peak | Stagger evaporator, rotovap, and chiller starts; recover off-peak | Right-size exhaust to code, not beyond; VFDs on fans if the AHJ allows |
Why load factor decides the bill
Load factor is average demand divided by peak demand. A grow with a 12-hour photoperiod runs at maybe 60 to 70 percent load factor because the lights hold the peak for half the day. A lab that peaks at the start of a recovery run and sits nearly idle overnight can run at 25 to 35 percent. Utilities bill demand on the peak 15- or 30-minute interval, so at equal kWh the lab pays more per kWh delivered. The mechanics are in demand charges explained and peak demand vs. peak usage.
Two consequences follow. First, a lab is often better off on a different rate class than the grow next door, and sometimes better off on a non-demand small commercial class if its peak can be held under the threshold; see utility rate classes explained. Second, a shared meter with a cultivation operation hides the lab's profile inside the grow's and usually costs the combined account money, which is the case for submetering multi-tenant cannabis buildings.
A worked example
Every figure below is an input we chose to make the arithmetic followable. Substitute your own equipment list and tariff.
Assume an ethanol lab running one eight-hour shift, five days a week. Equipment and assumed electrical draw at full operation:
| Load | Basis | Assumed kW |
|---|---|---|
| Falling film evaporator, electric | About 33 kVA nameplate at 240 V three-phase [trusteel-autovap-15]; assume 28 kW actual during recovery | 28 |
| Process chiller for the evaporator | Assume 12 kW electric input | 12 |
| Rotary evaporator, 20 L | 4.3 kW rated [across-solventvap-20l] | 4.3 |
| Four vacuum ovens | 1.5 kW each [across-eco-vacuum-oven] | 6 |
| Ethanol chilling (freezer or chiller), continuous | Assumed | 6 |
| Centrifuge, pumps, filtration | Assumed | 5 |
| Room exhaust and makeup air, continuous | Assumed | 5 |
| HVAC for the lab space | Assumed | 15 |
| Lighting, offices, packaging | Assumed | 8 |
| Coincident peak if everything starts together | about 89 kW |
Energy: during the shift the lab averages about 60 kW (not everything runs at once), so 60 kW x 8 h x 22 days = 10,560 kWh. Overnight and weekends the continuous loads (ethanol chilling, exhaust, some HVAC, a few ovens finishing a purge) average about 14 kW: 14 kW x (720 h minus 176 h) = 7,616 kWh. Monthly total about 18,200 kWh. Load factor: 18,200 kWh / (89 kW x 720 h) = 28 percent.
Bill, on an assumed tariff with a 15 dollar per kW demand charge and an energy price of 14.5 cents per kWh (near Illinois' June 2026 commercial average of 14.53 cents [eia-epm-5-6-a]):
- Demand: 89 kW x 15 dollars = 1,335 dollars
- Energy: 18,200 kWh x 0.145 = 2,639 dollars
- Total about 3,975 dollars, of which demand is 34 percent
Now change one thing. Start the rotovap and the vacuum ovens an hour after the falling film evaporator and its chiller. The evaporator, chiller, continuous loads, HVAC, and lighting now peak at about 79 kW, and the later rotovap-and-ovens block, which starts after the evaporator has settled, peaks lower still. Demand falls to 79 x 15 = 1,185 dollars, a saving of 150 dollars a month, about 1,800 dollars a year, with no change in kWh. Hold the HVAC setpoint a degree wider during that first hour and the peak drops further. On a tariff with a ratchet, the saving arrives only after the old peak ages out.
Compare the same 18,200 kWh drawn by a grow at 65 percent load factor: its peak would be 18,200 / (0.65 x 720) = 39 kW and its demand charge 585 dollars. Same energy, less than half the demand cost. That is the whole story of extraction lab billing.
Practical steps for a processing site
- Get the interval data. Ask the utility for 15-minute kW for the last year and find which interval sets each month's peak. In a lab it is almost always a heater and chiller starting in the same window.
- Sequence equipment starts. A simple controls rule, or a written SOP, that staggers evaporator, rotovap, oven, and chiller starts by 15 to 30 minutes does most of the work.
- Recover solvent off-peak where you have a time-of-use rate. Recovery does not need daylight.
- Check the rate class every time the equipment list changes. Adding a second evaporator can push a lab across a class threshold; removing one can bring it back.
- Treat ventilation as a design variable. Code sets minimums for the extraction room [csfd-extraction]; exhaust sized far beyond them is a permanent load. Confirm with the authority having jurisdiction before changing anything.
- Plan standby power for the right loads. A lab does not need a generator for the ovens, but gas detection, exhaust, and product freezers are a different question; see backup generators and standby power.
You can compare your site's intensity to other facility types in the facility type benchmark lookup.
Every equipment figure on this page is a manufacturer rating at full output. Actual draw depends on setpoint, ambient temperature, and how full the vessel is. Use the ratings to size service and estimate peaks; use interval meter data to see what your lab really does.
Frequently asked questions
Which extraction method uses the least electricity?
Per pound of biomass, hydrocarbon systems generally have the smallest process loads because the solvent boils at low temperature and recovery needs modest heat and cooling. But the C1D1 room's exhaust and gas detection run whether or not you are extracting, so a small hydrocarbon lab can have a surprisingly flat baseline. Ethanol labs use the most energy in solvent recovery; CO2 labs use the most in pumping and chilling.
Why is my lab's demand charge so high when the kWh is small?
Load factor. A lab that peaks at 90 kW for eight hours and idles at 15 kW the rest of the day averages maybe 30 kW, so its demand charge is billed on three times its average load. Grows have the opposite profile. Ask for interval data and see which piece of equipment sets the peak; it is usually a heater or chiller starting while everything else is already on.
Do I need three-phase service for an extraction lab?
Almost always for anything beyond bench scale. A 20-gallon-per-hour ethanol recovery unit is rated at roughly 79 amps at 240 volts three-phase, and process chillers of a few horsepower and up are three-phase as well. Confirm the utility can deliver the service size you need before you sign the lease; see our page on new facility buildout questions.
Can I run extraction at night to avoid peak rates?
Often yes, and it is one of the cheaper wins available. Solvent recovery and vacuum purging are batch steps that do not care what time it is. On a time-of-use rate, shifting the heater and chiller runs to off-peak hours cuts the energy price; on a demand-charge tariff, spreading equipment starts across the day cuts the peak.
Should the extraction lab be on its own meter?
If it shares a building with cultivation, usually yes. The lab's peaky profile and the grow's flat, huge profile land in different rate classes and benefit from different contract structures. Our submetering page covers when a separate utility meter versus a private submeter makes sense.
Related reading
- Demand Charges Explained for Cannabis Cultivators
What a demand charge is, how utilities measure peak kW in 15- or 30-minute windows, why grow rooms get hit hard, how ratchets work, and a worked example.
- Peak Demand vs. Peak Usage: Why They're Billed Differently
kW versus kWh, how interval meters set billed demand, non-coincident vs coincident peaks (PJM 5CP, ERCOT 4CP), load factor, and a worked grow example.
- Utility Rate Classes Explained: Small Commercial, Large Commercial, C&I
How utilities assign small, large, and C&I rate classes by peak kW, why the wrong class costs money, real tariff examples, and how to request a class review.
- Backup Generators and Standby Power for Licensed Cannabis Facilities
Sizing standby power for a grow, gas vs. diesel, EPA engine rules and permits, state security backup rules, and why generator peak shaving is limited.
- kWh per Square Foot: Benchmarking Cannabis Grow Facility Energy Use
Published kWh-per-square-foot benchmarks for indoor, greenhouse, and outdoor cannabis from RII PowerScore, Mills 2012, and regulators, plus canopy vs gross.
- Submetering for Multi-Tenant Cannabis Cultivation Buildings
Master meter vs. submeter, fair ways to split a shared electric bill, what revenue-grade means, how PUCs treat resale of power, and using the data to negotiate.
- Facility Type Energy Benchmark Lookup
Compare your annual kWh per square foot against published ranges for indoor, greenhouse, extraction, and dispensary cannabis facilities.
Jason Taken founded Jaken Energy, the commercial energy procurement practice behind this site. He works with licensed cannabis operators in deregulated electricity markets to lower supply rates, manage demand charges, and evaluate efficiency upgrades.
Sources
Inline citations in this article, such as [across-eco-vacuum-oven], refer to the entries below. Links open the primary source in a new tab.
- [across-eco-vacuum-oven]ECO 150C 1.9 Cu Ft Vacuum Drying Oven with LED Lights (electrical requirements) — Across International. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [across-500c-vacuum-oven]500C Max. 1.9 Cu Ft Vacuum Oven with Stainless Steel Tubing and 316L Chamber (electrical requirements) — Across International. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [across-solventvap-20l]Ai SolventVap 5.3G/20L Rotary Evaporator with Chiller and Pump, 220V (specifications) — Across International. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [trusteel-autovap-15]AutoVap 15 Solvent Recovery System with Automated Discharge Pump (capacity and electrical requirements) — TruSteel. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [polyscience-durachill]DuraChill Portable Chillers, 0.7 to 2.9 kW cooling (model specifications) — PolyScience. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [csfd-extraction]Medical Marijuana / Extraction Operations (extraction room requirements) — City of Colorado Springs Fire Department. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [nwpcc-cannabis]Electricity Consumption from Northwest Cannabis Production (survey analysis of 2017 Oregon and Washington licensed canopy) — Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [eia-cbecs-2018-c14]2018 Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey, Table C14: Electricity consumption and expenditure intensities — U.S. Energy Information Administration. Accessed 2026-09-12.
- [eia-epm-5-6-a]Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A: Average Price of Electricity to Ultimate Customers by End-Use Sector, by State, June 2026 and June 2025 — U.S. Energy Information Administration. Accessed 2026-09-12.